The Third Twin Essay Example For Students

The Third Twin Essay The Third Twin by Ken Follett is a type of mystery book. It makes you look at different aspects of the story. When you think you know whats happening it is not always what you think. Dr. Jeannie Ferrami, a scientist funded by a university who is doing a study on twins is one of the main characters in the story. Jeannie Ferrami is tall with long brown hair and is also very athletic. Steve Logan a student at another college is also a very important character in the story. Berrington Jones the head of the college funds Dr. Jeannie Ferrami until Jeannie discovers something Berrington didnt want her to know. Ricky Phillips Berringtons son is a twin just and he plays a small part but with a big impact on the story. Lisa Miller who is Jeannies best friend comes early into the story playing a very dramatic role, another small character is Dennis Pinker one of the twins in the story who is a murderer and is also being studied He is one of Steve Logans twin brothers. We will write a custom essay on The Third Twin specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Lisa Miller and Jeannie Ferammi are play tennis at the university they work for while changing in the locker room a fire breaks out in which Lisa is caught. Ricky Phillips poses as a security guard and ushers the woman out of the locker room all except Lisa who he rapes in the locker room. Soon after Ricky leaves Jeannie enters the locker room looking for Lisa who she finds unconscious and calls the firemen to help her get Lisa out. Lisa then ends up at the police station filing a report and giving a description of the man whom raped her. The next day Jeannie finds a match in the system she created to help aid her in her search for twins. In her research Jeannie is trying to prove that twins have the same behavior patterns as other twins. In Jeannies system she came up with Steve Logan and Dennis Pinker and found out Steve Logan was a model student at a college campus across town and Dennis Pinker was a convicted murderer at a state prison. Dr. Jeannie Ferrami contacts Steve Logan and Dennis Pinker. Steve Logan shows up to Jeannies office not knowing what to expect he doesnt know that he has a twin until Dr. Ferrami explains to him what she found based on her computer program. Jeannie then asks if he was adopted or if his mother put a child up for adoption Steve answers no, but then thinks to himself he might be adopted. Once Steve is done with the interview Dr. Ferrami tells him she will be visiting Dennis Pink er Steves twin brother to further her researchOnce Steve gets home he goes to his room and thinks to himself what if I was adopted why did my mother keep it from me. Once Steve is called to the dinner table he immediately asks his mother if he is adopted, and when his mother tells him no he asks if he had a twin brother; once again she says no. Steve Logan is know confused, was Dr. Ferramis computer program wrong. The next day Jeannie visits the jail where Dennis Pinker is and with one look she finds they are twins, with no doubt in her mind she feels as though they are twins. She soon discovers Steve Logan and Dennis Pinker are nothing alike but yet they look so much alike. When Jeannie is done interviewing Dennis she gets in her car and goes to a donut shop. Once at the donut shop she finds a tall dark haired man who she thinks is Steve Logan so they sit down and have coffee. Once done with the coffee Jeannie asks Steve if he wants a ride and he says sure. As Jeannie is driving on the highway Steve suddenly starts touching her when Jeannie tells him to stop he throws himself on her, then Jeannie makes a sharpe turn and throws The man out. Once Jeannie gets home she starts screaming and locks herself in her car where she calls the police. As Jeannie is calling the police Steve walks up to the window and asks what happened and she tells Steve to go away. .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 , .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 .postImageUrl , .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 , .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8:hover , .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8:visited , .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8:active { border:0!important; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8:active , .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8 .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf96c0ffaed12e653b0460ad01b925bc8:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: SAILING WITH CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS EssayOnce the police arrive Jeannie wants Steve arrested but Steve says he hasnt did anything, and the neighbor walks out and asks whats happening Jeannie tells them Steve tried to rape her an hour ago. The neighbor then tells them that that is impossible Steve has been sitting here waiting for you to come back for hours it couldnt be him. After Jeannie has Steve released and invites him in, Steve then asks how the interview with Dennis went she explained he is definitely your twin she told Steve they are exactly identical, then adds so is someone else. The man which tried to rape her looked exactly like Steve so she suggests maybe theyre triplets, and later found another match with her computer program Bill Stein a game programmer from uptown New York, so Jeannie pays a visit. Once in New York she has the police escort her to Bill Steins house to question him. Once at Bill Steins house the police interrogate him asking him where he was the other day Bill tells them he was at work working on a game program and his boss confirmed so he was off the hook. After the police interrogated him Jeannie asked him if he were adopted and he said no his parents had had him since birth. Once Jeannie gets back from New York She tells Steve he was another twin, but he says he wasnt adopted just like you and Dennis. Wondering what was going on she broke into Berrington Jones office and look on his personal files she found out that early in the 70s Berrington and a couple of other guys were in a government conspiracy in which they combined genetics and came up with the perfect soldier, they put the genetics together and planted them into eight woman whos husbands were men in the army. They planted the sperm in the woman when they came for regular checkups. Once Jeannie found out about this she confronted Berrington and had his son arrested. There was a little more to the ending but reading the book is a lot better than hearing it from me. The story ended with all the twins knowing they were genetic experiments and just wondering why. I think the author was trying to tell us that things were not always what they seem. Bibliography:The Third Twin by Ken Follet

Reasons to Write Properly

Reasons to Write Properly Reasons to Write Properly Reasons to Write Properly By Michael Why is it important to write correctly, to use standard grammar, spelling, and punctuation? Because you want people to understand you, thats all. Why are the picky details important? If my headline had said Write Good, wouldnt you understand that I meant Write Well? Maybe so, but its less distracting and easier to understand if I say it correctly. For a split second or longer, part of your mind would be confused, wondering if I was encouraging you to write about good things or something. Certainly part of your mind would wonder why you were seeing bad grammar in Daily Writing Tips. When my colleague Mark tried it as a joke, people noticed. Are you seeing my point? Scholars talk about prescriptive grammar and descriptive grammar. Prescriptive grammar means the way people are supposed to write. That has sometimes been misguided. As recently as the 19th century, some scholars taught that English should follow the rules of Latin because I cant think of a good reason now. On the other hand, descriptive grammar means the way people actually write, and thats hard to argue with. But isnt there a connection? Youre supposed to write the way people actually write, because its easier to understand that way. And because grammar changes over the centuries, grammar books do change as the language changes. Where students and teachers get into disagreements is when the young people insist that the way they write is now correct. Older teachers can recall saying the same thing when they were young, but in retrospect, being wrong. The slang of their youth didnt become a permanent part of the English language. Some students might say, I dont have to follow no made-up rules! If they say that, they are using a double negative, which was correct in Old English, before 1000 AD. After that, it was no longer correct. My advice: if English speakers have been following a rule for a thousand years, you might want to follow it too. People are probably used to it. Recognizing a pattern makes reading easier, and that includes patterns of grammar and spelling. Of course, we recognize letters from their shape. Its possible to read a line of text thats missing the bottom half of each letter, but difficult to read it without the top half. But research also suggests that the shape of a word helps us to recognize it. Even without my glasses, I can see that loop begins with an ascending letter and ends with a descending letter it slopes down while pool slopes up. When you type in ALL CAPS, every letter is the same height, so it not only looks like youre shouting, it also makes it much harder to read. Certain parts of contracts are legally required to be conspicuous, so they are often capitalized. But why? After all, putting them in bold or larger type is also conspicuous. Attorney Matthew Butterick, the author of Typography for Lawyers, says, All-caps para ­graphs are an example of self-defeat ­ing typog ­ra ­phy. Readers inevitably skip over the most important parts because they’re so hard to read. I hope lawyers dont write Terms of Service in all-caps to keep us from reading them. My point: our brains understand things more easily because they fit our expectations. The reason I try to use proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation is not to impress my fourth grade teacher Mrs. Cascales. Alas, her jazz piano has been silent for many years, and she is no longer checking my writing for mistakes. No, I try to write correctly because its easier to read, because youve seen it written that way (AKA written correctly) before. Sometimes even minor grammatical choices can make reading slower or faster. I gave one example in my article Is That a Noun or a Verb? I’m Confused. When you dont have to struggle with understanding my spelling or punctuation, you can focus on understanding my meaning. People judge you by your language. In an article in the Harvard Business Review, Good Grammar Should Be Everyone’s Business, Brad Hoover of Grammarly studied 100 LinkedIn profiles, all native English-speakers, all working in the consumer packaged goods industry, with three employers or less in the first 10 years of their careers. He discovered the ones with fewer grammar errors in their profile were promoted to director level or above within those 10 years, while the other half were not. In the musical My Fair Lady, Professor Higgins points out a lower-class flower girl and tells Colonel Pickering, If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do, why, you might be selling flowers too. When you leave out features in your writing that children learn in grade school, such as punctuation and capitalization, your readers will assume that you didnt complete grade school. Im not arguing for exalted language, but for clear communication. Big words can be as imprecise as little words. Some academic writing styles dont communicate more clearly, but only prove that you are an academic. Teachers and professors have to fight against spreading it. The improper use of passive voice is the best known symptom: It has been been demonstrated by Jenkins that instead of Jenkins proves that Weve written several articles to help you manage your use of passive voice, such as Passive Writing and 7 Examples of Valid Passive Construction. When I was working for a phone company, an older physician called about an unexpected bill he received. He said, This will not be disbursed. I couldnt resist saying, Oh, you mean you wont pay the bill? Apparently and unfortunately, he had been taught to use language as a barrier, to keep his patients in their place so they wouldnt question the bills he sends. Theres nothing wrong with short words. Some long words are used specifically to keep from stating the truth directly. Comedian George Carlin pointed out that what was called shell shock in the First World War became battle fatigue in the Second. Four syllables now, says Carlin. Takes a little longer to say. Doesn’t seem to hurt as much. Fatigue is a nicer word than shock. A corporation does not fire an employee; it arranges a negotiated departure or makes a workforce imbalance correction. Little things can have large consequences including punctuation. Lynne Truss, English author and broadcaster, notes that the 1905 October revolution in Russia began when Bolshevik printers demanded to be paid the same rate for punctuation marks as for letters. Truss hosted a BBC Radio broadcast about punctuation, Cutting a Dash, which led to a best-selling book in 2003. The title of the book, Eats, Shoots Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation, comes from a joke: A panda walks into a bar. He orders a sandwich, eats it, pulls out a gun, and fires two shots. The shocked bartender asks him why. The panda throws him a poorly-punctuated wildlife manual. Im a panda, he says, Look it up, and walks out the door. Sure enough, the entry for Panda reads, Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves. Here you see that an extra comma can lead to increased gun violence. Truss also wrote childrens books: Twenty-Odd Ducks: Why, Every Punctuation Mark Counts (2008) The Girls Like Spaghetti: Why, You Cant Manage Without Apostrophes! (2007). Notice that in each title, removing two punctuation marks completely changes the meaning. Only after Eats, Shoots Leaves went to press (naturally), Truss found details on another story she wished she could have included in her book. It concerned New England merchant Timothy Dexter (Newburyport, Massachusetts, 1748-1806), who wrote a pamphlet called A Pickle for the Knowing Ones, using his own unique spelling and no punctuation. At the back of his second edition, he included this note: Nowing ones complane of my book the fust edition had no stops I put in a Nuf here and thay may peper and solt it as they plese I cant be certain, but think he meant, Knowing Ones complain of my book. The first edition had no stops [periods]. I put in enough here, and they may pepper and salt it as they please. It was followed by a page of punctuation marks for their use. The problem is that proper punctuation, spelling, and grammar are not condiments that can be added or left out on a whim. Not bothering to get them right may be easier on the writer, but harder on the reader. I think Dexters note proves my point, though I cant be certain, because Im not completely sure what he was trying to say. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Writing Basics category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Writing a Reference Letter (With Examples)Rules for Capitalization in Titles13 Theatrical Terms in Popular Usage